Things that ‘incite but don’t invite’ (5 phrases to avoid when in pursuit of civil discourse)

A bumper sticker I recently spotted, indicative of the problem at large. It reads, “If I agreed with you, then we’d both be wrong.”

Those familiar with my blog and my work know that I am concerned about the lack of civil discourse in today’s communications, especially in social media. People who claim to be passionate, knowledgeable, and educated seem not to value civility, and seem to have even less respect for the notion of a smart-debate that leads to changed minds—or at least to common ground.

I have started compiling a list of words and phrases that I shall choose to avoid as part of a personal mission to effect change here. Please add any others in a comment below. Similarly, if you disagree, by all means, please offer your push-back in a comment below.

For now, here’s my list:

  1. “Stop.  Just stop.”  This one frequently appears as if the person posting doesn’t even need to articulate a contrasting argument.  They simply post something like, “To those of you who say __________.  Stop. Just stop.”  Clearly this is not meant to be an ingredient of discourse.  It is meant as a one-sided, sanctimonious crowd-pleaser for those with whom there is already agreement.
  2. “Utter nonsense.”  Either inserted as a two-word sentence at the end of a post that repeats the contrasting view, or interwoven within a condescending statement that might incite someone, but certainly does not invite them to a dialogue.  This is a monologue.
  3. “White men.”  Racial and gender slurs are never civil.  As a “white man” myself, you may be surprised to hear that I understand why people use this phrase.  Believe it or not, there are white men who treat other white men in precisely the ways that earn them the negative stereotype.   But it is a stereotype.  I know many, wonderful, kind, compassionate, sacrificial white men, and the all-encompassing slur simply does not serve to effect change.
  4. “God says _________.”  We have become far too careless in our citations of the Divine.  Too often this phrase either introduces a misquoted Scripture or a verse out of context.  When one is truly respectful of God, one must be extremely careful about putting words into a Holy mouth.  Surely a loving God approaches discourse with civility, and with intent to compel, not repel.
  5. “You’re an idiot.”  Most everyone has moments when they feel that another’s opinions are “idiotic,” especially when no attempt is made to understand the social construction that has led to the differing points of view.  And not only is this phrasing politically incorrect and offensive, the layers of implications about the one posting it are many.  Why engage with someone if you believe them to be of deficient mental capacity and reasoning?  On the other hand, if you truly are of superior intellect, isn’t it your social and moral responsibility to offer insights that others might not have, rather than to crudely demean them through the perhaps oldest insult in the book—right after something about “Yo’ mama?”

3 comments for “Things that ‘incite but don’t invite’ (5 phrases to avoid when in pursuit of civil discourse)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.